Micromanagement As Top Indicator of a Toxic Workplace, Causing People to Quit -Survey Finds

Micromanagement
(Photo : Unsplash/ Afif Ramdhasuma )

A toxic work culture, whether stemming from a problematic boss or competitive colleagues, is a significant catalyst for employee resignations. 

In a recent Monster survey conducted on over 6,000 U.S. workers, 73% of professionals identified micromanagement as the top indicator of a toxic workplace, and 46% mentioned it as a factor that would lead them to quit. 

What is Micromanagement? 

According to Monster career expert Vicki Salemi, micromanagement often arises from a boss's lack of confidence and trust in their employees. Trust issues between employees and managers have intensified with the rise of remote and hybrid work. Research indicates managers may not always trust employees to be productive in remote work settings. 

What is a Micromanager?

A micromanager closely oversees and controls the work of their team members, often feeling the need to exert extreme control over their decisions and tasks. While their intentions may be good, these tendencies can hinder the team's development of independent leadership behaviors. Some common reasons why people micromanage include:

  • Fear of loss of control over projects
  • The belief that superior work may make them look inadequate
  • Extreme need for control and domination
  • Poor self-image and insecurities
  • Inexperience in management

The Long-term Effects of Micromanagement

Studies indicate that micromanagement ranks among the top three reasons for employee resignations. Prolonged use of micromanagement signals a lack of trust and disempowers employees, hindering their ability to be creative, solve problems, and feel confident in their work. Constant oversight increases workplace stress, burnout, and diminished employee morale. Eventually, team members may lose so much confidence that they become reliant on micromanagement.

READ ALSO: The Repercussions of Employer Surveillance, Workers Getting Worse at Their Jobs And More Likely To Quit

Extended micromanagement negatively affects managers as well. As teams and projects expand, maintaining the same level of oversight becomes challenging, resulting in overwork and burnout. Micromanagement does not scale effectively, causing bottlenecks and hindering teams from reaching their full potential. Essentially, a manager's role is to coach, remove obstacles, and make high-level strategic decisions. Providing employees with the necessary resources and support empowers them to handle minor details independently. 

Ways to Prevent Micromanagement

Here are specific steps you can take to avoid micromanagement within your team: 

Establish Clear Expectations

Clearly define roles, responsibilities, and expectations for each team member. When everyone understands their tasks and goals, there is less room for micromanagement. This clarity promotes trust and empowers employees to take ownership of their work.

Encourage Open Communication

Foster an environment where team members feel comfortable expressing their ideas, concerns, and progress. Regular check-ins and open communication channels allow discussions about work processes and performance. This reduces the need for constant supervision, as issues can be addressed collaboratively.

Provide Training and Development Opportunities

Invest in the professional growth of your team by offering training and development programs. When employees feel confident and skilled in their roles, the need for micromanagement diminishes. Promoting continuous learning empowers your team to handle tasks independently and make informed decisions.

RELATED ARTICLE: Unveiling the Workplace Burnout: "It's Not Me, It's You" -Addressing the Root Causes

Real Time Analytics